An honest comparison.
You'll shortlist three to five tools. Here's where LITIGATER wins, and where the others do.
Clio runs the business of a firm better than we ever will: billing, intake, trust accounting. Everlaw processes discovery at a scale we don't chase. Harvey and CoCounsel serve enterprise research-and-drafting deployments with resources we respect. If those are your needs, buy those tools. Some of them sync with ours.
LITIGATER does the one thing none of them do: it holds the proof.
| Capability | LITIGATER | Practice management (Clio-class) | Ediscovery (Everlaw-class) | Enterprise legal AI (Harvey, CoCounsel) | Litigation point tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Element-level proof tracking | Has it as core | Not the product | Not the product | Not the product | Partial |
| Sealed, hash-chained evidence record | Has it as core | Not the product | Partial | Not the product | Not the product |
| Live deposition copilot | Has it as core | Not the product | Not the product | Not the product | Partial |
| Cross-record impeachment ledger | Has it as core | Not the product | Partial | Not the product | Partial |
| Two-layer citation verification | Has it as core | Not the product | Not the product | Partial | Not the product |
| Rules-based deadline engine | Has it as core | Partial | Not the product | Not the product | Has it as core |
| Firm ops, billing, intake | Not the productthat's Clio's job: we integrate | Has it as core | Not the product | Not the product | Not the product |
| Terabyte-scale discovery processing | Partial | Not the product | Has it as core | Partial | Not the product |
| Public pricing | Has it as core | Has it as core | Not the product | Not the product | Partial |
The proof layer is the gap in every stack above. It's the whole point of ours.
Comparisons reflect publicly available information. Corrections welcome at hello@example.com. All marks belong to their owners.